ChainScore Labs
All Guides

How Coverage NFTs and Policies Are Structured

LABS

How Coverage NFTs and Policies Are Structured

Chainscore © 2025

Core Structural Components

The architecture of coverage protocols is built on specific, interconnected components that define risk, manage capital, and enforce claims.

Coverage Policy

A Coverage Policy is the primary smart contract representing a user's active protection. It encodes the coverage parameters, including the insured protocol, coverage amount, premium, and expiration block. The policy is minted as an NFT to the holder, making it a transferable asset. This structure allows for secondary market trading and clear ownership of the coverage position.

Risk Pool

A Risk Pool is a vault where stakers deposit capital (e.g., USDC, ETH) to backstop potential claims. It uses actuarial models to calculate required capital reserves based on the risk profiles of covered protocols. Stakers earn premiums from policy purchases as yield. This pooled capital model is fundamental for protocol solvency and scaling coverage capacity across multiple assets.

Cover Module

A Cover Module is a specialized smart contract that defines the conditions for a valid claim. It contains the logic for verifying that a hack or exploit occurred on a specific protocol, often relying on oracle feeds or governance escalation. Each insured DeFi protocol typically has its own module. This modular design allows the system to adapt coverage to diverse contract architectures and failure modes.

Policy Manager

The Policy Manager is the core orchestrator contract that mints, renews, and burns coverage NFTs. It handles premium payments, distributes funds to risk pools, and interfaces with cover modules during the claims process. This component enforces all business logic, such as policy expiration and payout calculations. It acts as the single source of truth for the state of all active coverage positions.

Claims Assessor

A Claims Assessor is a mechanism, often decentralized, that validates incident reports and triggers payouts. It can be an on-chain voting system for token holders, a committee of experts, or an automated oracle. This component is critical for mitigating moral hazard and ensuring only legitimate claims are paid. Its design directly impacts the trustlessness and finality of the coverage protocol.

Premium Pricing Model

The Premium Pricing Model is an algorithm that dynamically calculates the cost of coverage based on real-time risk. Factors include the total value locked in the insured protocol, historical exploit data, and the capital available in the risk pool. Premiums are typically denominated as an annual percentage rate (APR). Accurate pricing is essential for attracting both capital stakers and policy purchasers to the ecosystem.

Policy Parameterization

Understanding Policy Terms

Policy parameterization defines the specific rules and conditions of a coverage agreement. Think of it as the customizable settings for an insurance policy, determining what is protected, for how long, and under what circumstances a claim is valid.

Key Components

  • Covered Protocol: The specific DeFi application (e.g., Aave, Compound) where funds are deposited and protected.
  • Covered Assets: The specific tokens (e.g., USDC, WETH) held within the protocol that are eligible for coverage.
  • Coverage Amount: The maximum sum insured, often expressed as a percentage of the user's deposited value.
  • Policy Duration: The fixed period (e.g., 30, 90, 180 days) for which the coverage is active and premiums are paid.
  • Deductible/Excess: The initial portion of any loss that the policyholder must bear before coverage pays out, which can lower premium costs.

Example Scenario

A user deposits 10 ETH into the Lido staking protocol. They can parameterize a policy to cover 80% of that value (8 ETH) against smart contract exploits on Lido for a 90-day term, with a 5% deductible.

Policy Issuance and NFT Minting Flow

Process overview

1

Initiate Policy Application

User submits a request to the coverage protocol with specific parameters.

Detailed Instructions

A user or a dApp initiates a coverage request by calling the protocol's applyForPolicy function. This requires specifying the coverage parameters: the underlying smart contract address (e.g., 0x...), the coverage amount in the protocol's stablecoin, the coverage period (e.g., 30 days), and the premium rate. The function call must be accompanied by the premium payment, which is calculated based on the amount, duration, and risk assessment of the covered contract. The protocol's actuary module will assess the request against current risk models and capital pool availability.

  • Sub-step 1: Encode the function call with abi.encodeWithSignature
  • Sub-step 2: Approve the premium token transfer via the ERC-20 approve function
  • Sub-step 3: Execute the transaction from an EOA or a smart contract wallet
solidity
// Example call structure IPolicyManager(policyManagerAddress).applyForPolicy( coveredContract, coverageAmount, coverageDuration, premium );

Tip: Always verify the policy manager contract address on the protocol's official documentation to avoid interacting with malicious forks.

2

Underwrite and Approve Risk

The protocol's decentralized underwriting process evaluates and accepts the risk.

Detailed Instructions

Upon submission, the application enters a pending state where it is evaluated. For decentralized protocols, this often involves a staking-based approval system where underwriters (stakers) vote to accept or reject the risk based on predefined criteria. The protocol's smart contract checks if the requested coverage aligns with the available capital in the relevant risk pool and that the covered contract is not on a blacklist. If approved, the contract state updates, locking the requisite capital from the pool and generating a unique policy ID. This ID is a hash of the applicant's address, the covered contract, and the block timestamp, ensuring uniqueness.

  • Sub-step 1: Monitor the transaction receipt for the PolicyApplied event
  • Sub-step 2: Query the policy manager for the application status using the returned applicationId
  • Sub-step 3: Wait for the approval transaction to be confirmed on-chain
solidity
// Event signature for tracking event PolicyApplied( uint256 indexed applicationId, address indexed applicant, address coveredContract, uint256 amount );

Tip: The approval time can vary based on network congestion and the protocol's governance parameters; factor this into your application timing.

3

Mint the Coverage NFT

A non-fungible token representing the policy ownership and terms is minted.

Detailed Instructions

After underwriting approval, the protocol's NFT minter contract is invoked to create the Coverage NFT. This is typically an ERC-721 or ERC-1155 token where the token URI points to a metadata file containing the policy's immutable terms. The minting function, often mintPolicyNFT, is permissioned and can only be called by the policy manager contract. The NFT is minted directly to the policyholder's address. The token's tokenId is usually the same as the finalized policy ID. The metadata stored off-chain (e.g., on IPFS) includes structured data like the coverage expiration timestamp, covered address, sum insured, and a reference to the policy's on-chain state.

  • Sub-step 1: The policy manager calls the minter contract with the approved policy details
  • Sub-step 2: The NFT contract mints the token and emits a Transfer event
  • Sub-step 3: The metadata JSON is pinned to IPFS (e.g., via Pinata) and the URI is set
solidity
// Simplified minting logic called internally by the protocol function _mintPolicyNFT(address to, uint256 policyId, string memory tokenURI) internal { _safeMint(to, policyId); _setTokenURI(policyId, tokenURI); }

Tip: Always verify the NFT's token URI resolves correctly and that the metadata hash matches the on-record hash to ensure integrity.

4

Policy Activation and Fund Locking

The coverage becomes active, and capital is formally allocated.

Detailed Instructions

Minting the NFT triggers the final activation step. The protocol's core contract updates the policy's status from APPROVED to ACTIVE. This action moves the coverage amount from the general capital pool into a locked escrow specifically earmarked for this policy. The effective start timestamp is recorded, and the countdown for the coverage period begins. The policyholder can now view their active coverage in the protocol's UI, identified by their NFT. The locked funds are now unavailable for other underwriting activities and serve as the backing for a potential claim. This state is maintained until the policy expires or a valid claim is made.

  • Sub-step 1: The policyActivated event is emitted, containing the policyId and activation timestamp
  • Sub-step 2: Query the capital pool contract to confirm the specific reserve increase for the policy
  • Sub-step 3: The policyholder's NFT becomes the verifiable proof of active coverage in integrated dApps
solidity
// State transition within the policy storage policy.status = PolicyStatus.ACTIVE; policy.activeAt = block.timestamp; policy.expiresAt = block.timestamp + policy.coverageDuration; // Capital is allocated capitalPool.lockFunds(policyId, policy.coverageAmount);

Tip: The activation block timestamp is critical for calculating the exact expiration. Always use the on-chain event data, not the transaction submission time.

5

Ongoing Management and Expiry

Monitoring the active policy and handling its conclusion.

Detailed Instructions

During the active period, the policyholder must monitor the covered contract for vulnerabilities or exploits. The NFT is transferable, allowing the policy ownership to be sold on secondary markets, but the coverage terms remain tied to the original covered address. The protocol may offer functions to top-up coverage or extend the period for an additional premium, which would involve a new transaction and potentially minting a new NFT or updating the existing one. Upon expiration, anyone can call a expirePolicy function to trigger the state change from ACTIVE to EXPIRED. This releases the locked capital back to the pool, making it available for new policies. The NFT remains as a record but is marked as inactive in the protocol's state.

  • Sub-step 1: Set up monitoring for events from the covered contract
  • Sub-step 2: To extend, call extendPolicy(policyId, additionalPremium, extraDuration)
  • Sub-step 3: After the expiry timestamp passes, call policyManager.expirePolicy(policyId) to finalize
solidity
// Example expiry function function expirePolicy(uint256 policyId) external { require(policy.expiresAt < block.timestamp, "Not expired"); policy.status = PolicyStatus.EXPIRED; capitalPool.releaseFunds(policyId); emit PolicyExpired(policyId); }

Tip: Expiring a policy is a public good function that helps keep the protocol's state clean and capital efficient; it may include a small gas reimbursement.

Protocol Implementation Comparison

Comparison of structural and operational approaches for Coverage NFT and policy frameworks.

FeatureERC-721 Based RegistryERC-1155 Multi-TokenCustom Solidity Implementation

Token Standard

ERC-721

ERC-1155

Custom ERC-721 Extension

Gas Cost for Mint

~120k gas

~90k gas (batchable)

~150k gas (with logic)

Policy Data Storage

Off-chain (IPFS URI)

On-chain struct mapping

Hybrid (on-chain core, off-chain details)

Claim Processing

Multi-sig governance

Automated via oracle

Hybrid (automated with governance veto)

Premium Payment

Stablecoin transfer per epoch

Wrapped native token streaming

Any ERC-20 via payment router

Coverage Limit Enforcement

Fixed in policy terms

Dynamic based on pool reserves

Risk-adjusted, algorithmically set

Policy Transferability

Fully transferable post-claim

Non-transferable after active claim

Transferable with cooldown period

Smart Contract Architecture

The on-chain structure governing the issuance, management, and claims of decentralized insurance policies.

Coverage NFT

The Coverage NFT is the core policy token, representing an active insurance position. It is a non-transferable, soulbound ERC-721 token minted upon policy purchase.

  • Encodes policy parameters like coverage amount, premium, and expiration in its metadata.
  • Serves as the immutable proof of coverage for the policyholder.
  • Its non-transferability ensures the policy is tied to the original risk holder, preventing secondary market speculation on active claims.

PolicyManager

The PolicyManager contract is the central registry and lifecycle manager for all coverage. It handles the creation, renewal, and expiration of policies.

  • Validates policy parameters and risk parameters against protocol rules.
  • Mints and burns Coverage NFTs upon policy activation and expiry.
  • Calculates and collects premiums, distributing them to the capital pool. This contract is the system's single source of truth for active coverage.

ClaimsProcessor

The ClaimsProcessor contract manages the entire claims adjudication workflow, from submission to payout. It enforces the protocol's claims logic.

  • Receives and validates claim submissions, requiring proof-of-loss from oracles or specific on-chain events.
  • Manages a voting or assessment period for decentralized claim verification.
  • Authorizes payouts from the capital pool to valid claimants. This automated process removes insurer discretion and ensures predictable outcomes.

CapitalPool

The CapitalPool is the vault contract that holds all premium deposits and capital backing the active policies. It is the source of funds for claims payouts.

  • Aggregates premiums paid by policyholders.
  • May delegate assets to yield-generating strategies to improve capital efficiency.
  • Has authorized withdrawal functions solely for the ClaimsProcessor. This segregation of funds ensures solvency and transparent management of protocol reserves.

Oracle Integration

Oracle Integration refers to the smart contract modules that connect to external data providers to trigger and validate claims based on real-world or cross-chain events.

  • Uses decentralized oracle networks like Chainlink to verify hack events, exchange outages, or smart contract failures.
  • Provides the necessary proof-of-loss data to the ClaimsProcessor.
  • Critical for enabling coverage for off-chain or complex on-chain risks, moving beyond simple parametric triggers.

Governance & Parameters

The Governance & Parameters system controls upgradeable contract logic and key risk variables. It is typically managed by a DAO or multi-sig.

  • Allows adjustment of parameters like premium rates, coverage limits, and claim assessment periods.
  • Controls the addition of new coverage types or supported protocols.
  • Manages upgrades to core contracts via timelocks. This ensures the protocol can adapt to new risks and market conditions in a decentralized manner.
SECTION-FAQ_TECHNICAL

Technical Implementation FAQs

Ready to Start Building?

Let's bring your Web3 vision to life.

From concept to deployment, ChainScore helps you architect, build, and scale secure blockchain solutions.