Using NFTs as Identity and Credit Primitives

LABS

Using NFTs as Identity and Credit Primitives

Core Concepts of Identity and Credit NFTs

Foundational principles for understanding how non-fungible tokens can represent and verify identity while enabling programmable credit systems.

Soulbound Tokens (SBTs)

Soulbound Tokens are non-transferable NFTs permanently bound to a single wallet, representing immutable credentials.

Represent achievements, memberships, or legal attestations that cannot be sold.
Enable Sybil-resistance by proving unique personhood.
Form the basis for decentralized identity graphs, allowing protocols to assess reputation and creditworthiness without relying on centralized data.

Verifiable Credentials

Verifiable Credentials are cryptographically signed attestations stored as NFTs, proving claims about an identity.

Issued by trusted authorities like governments, employers, or DAOs.
Enable selective disclosure, allowing users to prove specific attributes (e.g., age > 18) without revealing the full credential.
Critical for underwriting in DeFi, as they provide tamper-proof proof of income, collateral ownership, or credit history.

Reputation & Credit Scoring

On-chain reputation aggregates user activity into a portable, composable score represented by an NFT.

Scores are built from transaction history, loan repayments, and governance participation.
Enables undercollateralized lending by using the reputation NFT as a proxy for trust.
Protocols can programmatically adjust credit limits and interest rates based on the real-time state of the reputation NFT.

Programmable Credit Primitives

Credit NFTs are dynamic tokens that encode terms, balances, and performance of a credit line.

Act as a programmable ledger for debt, with the NFT's metadata updating with payment history.
Can be used as collateral in other DeFi protocols, creating a composable credit layer.
Enable novel mechanisms like credit delegation, where a user can temporarily transfer their credit allowance to another wallet.

Identity Graph Composability

Composable identity refers to the ability for different protocols to read and write to a user's decentralized identity profile built from multiple NFTs.

A lending protocol can read a user's SBTs from an education DAO and a Verifiable Credential from an employer.
This cross-protocol data layer allows for holistic risk assessment.
Users maintain custody and control over which parts of their graph are shared with each application.

Revocation & Expiry Mechanisms

Dynamic state management is essential for credentials and credit that have time-bound validity or can be revoked.

NFTs can integrate with off-chain registries or on-chain oracles to check revocation status.
Expiry dates can be baked into the smart contract, automatically invalidating the credential.
This ensures the system remains current and secure, preventing the use of stale or compromised identity data.

NFT Identity Models and Implementations

Foundational Identity Frameworks

Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) represent non-transferable credentials, forming a persistent on-chain identity graph. Reputation NFTs are often transferable but accrue value based on verifiable actions, creating portable social capital. Access NFTs function as dynamic keys, with permissions that can be revoked or updated by the issuer.

Key Distinctions

Permanence vs. Flexibility: SBTs are immutable records, while reputation NFTs can evolve with new metadata or be traded, creating different incentive models.
Issuer Centralization: Models range from self-attested (e.g., a POAP for event attendance) to institutionally verified (e.g., a KYC credential from a regulated entity).
Composability: These tokens can be programmed to interact, such as an access NFT requiring a minimum balance of reputation points from a separate contract.

Real-World Analogy

Think of SBTs as a permanent academic transcript, reputation NFTs as a professional license that can be sold, and access NFTs as a club membership card that the issuer can deactivate.

Building a Credit Primitive with NFTs

Process overview

Define the On-Chain Identity Schema

Establish the data structure for the credit NFT

Detailed Instructions

Define the credit primitive by designing the NFT's metadata schema. This schema should encode immutable identity attributes and mutable financial data. Use a hybrid approach: store static KYC/AML verification hashes (like a bytes32 proofOfIdentity) on-chain, while linking to off-chain data via a URI for detailed credit history.

Sub-step 1: Design the core struct in your smart contract to include fields like uint256 creditScore, uint256 debtCeiling, and uint256 lastUpdated.
Sub-step 2: Implement a mapping to link user addresses to their credit NFT token ID, ensuring a one-to-one relationship.
Sub-step 3: Plan for upgradeability by using a proxy pattern or storing schema versioning in the contract to allow future field additions.

solidity
struct CreditProfile {
    uint256 creditScore;
    uint256 debtCeiling;
    uint256 lastUpdatedTimestamp;
    bytes32 identityProofHash;
    string metadataURI;
}
mapping(address => uint256) public addressToTokenId;
mapping(uint256 => CreditProfile) public tokenIdToProfile;

Tip: Use established standards like EIP-721 with metadata extension (EIP-721A for gas efficiency) to ensure compatibility with existing wallets and marketplaces.

Implement the Underwriter Logic and Minting

Create the smart contract functions to issue and update credit NFTs

Detailed Instructions

Develop the minting and underwriting logic controlled by a permissioned entity or a decentralized oracle network. The mint function should be restricted to a designated underwriter role. It must validate off-chain data, calculate an initial credit score, and set a corresponding debt ceiling before minting.

Sub-step 1: Create a mintCreditNFT function that takes parameters for the recipient address, initial score, ceiling, and proof hash. It should check if the address already possesses a credit NFT.
Sub-step 2: Implement an internal _calculateDebtCeiling function that uses the credit score and potentially collateral value (for hybrid models) to determine a safe borrowing limit (e.g., ceiling = score * 100 * 1e18).
Sub-step 3: Emit a structured event like CreditNFTMinted(address indexed user, uint256 tokenId, uint256 score, uint256 ceiling) for off-chain indexing and monitoring.

solidity
function mintCreditNFT(
    address _to,
    uint256 _initialScore,
    bytes32 _proofHash,
    string calldata _uri
) external onlyUnderwriter returns (uint256) {
    require(addressToTokenId[_to] == 0, "Address already has a credit NFT");
    uint256 newTokenId = _tokenIdCounter.current();
    uint256 ceiling = _calculateDebtCeiling(_initialScore);
    _safeMint(_to, newTokenId);
    tokenIdToProfile[newTokenId] = CreditProfile(_initialScore, ceiling, block.timestamp, _proofHash, _uri);
    addressToTokenId[_to] = newTokenId;
    emit CreditNFTMinted(_to, newTokenId, _initialScore, ceiling);
}

Tip: Consider incorporating a time-lock or governance vote for the underwriter role's actions to add a layer of decentralization and auditability.

Integrate with Lending Protocols

Enable credit NFTs to be used as a factor in decentralized lending

Detailed Instructions

Facilitate protocol integration by creating adapter contracts or modifying existing lending pools to read from your credit primitive. The key is to allow the credit NFT's debtCeiling and creditScore to influence loan terms without requiring physical collateral, moving towards undercollateralized lending.

Sub-step 1: Develop a CreditOracle contract that lending protocols can query. It should expose a view function like getCreditLimit(address user) that returns the user's current debt ceiling and outstanding debt across integrated protocols.
Sub-step 2: Work with a lending protocol (e.g., a forked Aave or a custom pool) to modify its borrow function. Add a check that calls your oracle to ensure currentDebt + newBorrowAmount <= creditLimit.
Sub-step 3: Implement a debt tracking mechanism, likely via the oracle, that updates a user's utilized credit across all protocols when they borrow or repay, preventing limit overruns.

solidity
// Example CreditOracle function
function getCreditLimit(address _user) external view returns (uint256 limit, uint256 utilized) {
    uint256 tokenId = addressToTokenId[_user];
    require(tokenId != 0, "No credit profile");
    CreditProfile memory profile = tokenIdToProfile[tokenId];
    limit = profile.debtCeiling;
    utilized = currentDebt[_user]; // Tracks debt across protocols
    return (limit, utilized);
}

Tip: Start with a single, well-understood lending pool to manage risk and complexity before enabling cross-protocol debt synchronization.

Establish a Credit Update and Reassessment Mechanism

Create a secure process for updating scores and handling defaults

Detailed Instructions

Design a dynamic update system for the credit primitive. Scores and ceilings must be reassessed based on repayment history and on-chain activity. This requires a secure method for submitting new data and a logic to handle defaults or score degradation.

Sub-step 1: Create an updateCreditScore function, callable by the underwriter or a decentralized keeper, which can increase/decrease a user's score and recalculate their debt ceiling. It should log the reason (e.g., bytes32 reasonHash).
Sub-step 2: Implement a liquidation trigger. If a user's credit score falls below a threshold (e.g., 300) or they exceed their debt ceiling, flag their NFT. This could allow integrated protocols to initiate recovery actions.
Sub-step 3: Build an off-chain indexer that monitors repayment events from integrated lending protocols. Use this data feed to automatically trigger periodic score reassessments via a trusted oracle or keeper network.

solidity
event CreditScoreUpdated(uint256 indexed tokenId, uint256 newScore, uint256 newCeiling, bytes32 reason);

function updateCreditScore(uint256 _tokenId, uint256 _newScore, bytes32 _reasonHash) external onlyUpdater {
    CreditProfile storage profile = tokenIdToProfile[_tokenId];
    require(profile.lastUpdatedTimestamp + UPDATE_COOLDOWN < block.timestamp, "In cooldown");
    profile.creditScore = _newScore;
    profile.debtCeiling = _calculateDebtCeiling(_newScore);
    profile.lastUpdatedTimestamp = block.timestamp;
    emit CreditScoreUpdated(_tokenId, _newScore, profile.debtCeiling, _reasonHash);
}

Tip: For decentralized updates, consider a scheme where updates are proposed and must reach consensus among a committee of token holders or a dedicated oracle network like Chainlink.

Protocols Using NFTs for Identity and Credit

Comparison of on-chain identity and credit scoring protocols using NFTs.

Protocol / Feature	Sismo	ARCx	Getaverse	RociFi
Primary NFT Type	Soulbound ZK Badges (SBTs)	DeFi Credit Score Passport	Soulbound Identity Card	Credit Score NFT
Data Source	Aggregated from multiple Web2/Web3 accounts	On-chain DeFi transaction history	On-chain activity & verified credentials	On-chain history & cross-chain data
Scoring Methodology	Reputation attestations via zero-knowledge proofs	Proprietary algorithm based on wallet health & diversity	Modular scoring across different trait categories	Machine learning model analyzing repayment likelihood
Mint Cost / Fee	Gas-only for user (protocol subsidizes ZK)	~$50-$200 (gas + protocol fee)	Gas-only for basic, fee for premium verification	Gas-only for mint, fee for credit underwriting
Credit Utility	Access gating, sybil resistance, governance	Capital-efficient borrowing, customized loan terms	Access to campaigns, airdrops, governance	Under-collateralized lending, risk-based rates
Identity Portability	Fully portable; badges are self-custodied	Portable score; new protocol integration required	Portable identity card across Getaverse ecosystem	Portable score; requires integration by lending pool
Privacy Level	High (ZK proofs hide source data)	Low (score is public, derived from public data)	Selective disclosure of verified credentials	Low (score is public on-chain)
Primary Use Case	Sybil-resistant governance & airdrops	DeFi credit for under-collateralized loans	Web3 marketing & loyalty programs	Under-collateralized multi-chain lending

Technical Design and Security Considerations

Implementing NFTs as identity and credit primitives requires careful architectural decisions and robust security practices to ensure system integrity and user safety.

Soulbound Token (SBT) Standards

Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) are non-transferable NFTs that bind identity or reputation to a wallet. They are critical for preventing Sybil attacks and establishing persistent on-chain identity.

ERC-721 with a locked transfer function is a common implementation.
ERC-5192 provides a minimal interface for non-transferable NFTs.
ERC-4973 offers a more opinionated standard for account-bound tokens.
Using these standards ensures interoperability and clear signaling for wallets and marketplaces.

Credit Scoring Oracles

Credit oracles are off-chain data providers that compute creditworthiness and attest to it on-chain via verifiable credentials or minted NFTs.

Oracles aggregate data from traditional credit bureaus, on-chain transaction history, and DeFi activity.
They issue verifiable credentials (e.g., using W3C standards) that can be minted as claim NFTs.
A zero-knowledge proof system can allow users to prove a score threshold without revealing the raw data.
This decouples sensitive computation from the public ledger while maintaining auditability.

Revocation and Expiry Mechanisms

Identity and credit NFTs must have mechanisms to become invalid, either through expiration or revocation by an issuer.

Implement an expiry timestamp within the token metadata or a separate registry contract.
Use a revocation registry (like EIP-5539) where issuers can invalidate compromised or outdated credentials.
For decentralized systems, consider community-governed revocation via a DAO vote.
Without these, stale or fraudulent credentials persist indefinitely, undermining system trust.

Privacy-Preserving Verification

Proving attributes from an identity NFT without exposing the underlying data is essential for user privacy.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) allow a user to prove they hold a valid credential meeting specific criteria (e.g., credit score > 650).
Semaphore or ZK-SNARK circuits can generate proofs of group membership or reputation score ranges.
Polygon ID and Sismo are examples of protocols implementing such privacy layers.
This enables undercollateralized lending applications where borrowers prove creditworthiness privately.

Sybil Resistance and Uniqueness

Preventing a single entity from creating multiple identities is fundamental for any credit system.

Proof of Personhood protocols like Worldcoin or BrightID provide a base layer of uniqueness.
Social graph analysis can cluster addresses likely controlled by the same entity.
Staking or bonding mechanisms impose a cost on identity creation to deter fake accounts.
Combining these methods makes it economically and technically difficult to game the identity system.

Interoperability and Composability

Identity NFTs must be usable across different protocols and chains to maximize utility.

Deploy using cross-chain messaging (like LayerZero or CCIP) to mirror credentials on multiple networks.
Adhere to emerging cross-chain attestation standards (e.g., EAS on multiple L2s).
Design modular credential schemas so a credit NFT from one protocol can be understood by another.
This prevents fragmentation and allows a user's on-chain reputation to be portable across the DeFi ecosystem.

Implementing an NFT-Based Access Control System

Process overview

Design the Access Logic and NFT Specification

Define the smart contract architecture and token properties.

Detailed Instructions

Define the access control logic your NFT will enforce. Determine if access is binary (holder vs. non-holder) or tiered (different token IDs or traits grant different permissions). Specify the ERC-721 token metadata structure, including any on-chain traits (like uint256 tier) or off-chain attributes that will be referenced.

Sub-step 1: Map each required user permission to a specific token trait or ID range.
Sub-step 2: Decide on minting mechanics: fixed collection, soulbound (non-transferable), or dynamic minting by admin.
Sub-step 3: Plan the verification interface for your dApp to check a user's token and its properties.

solidity
// Example interface for checking tiered access
interface IAccessNFT {
    function getTier(uint256 tokenId) external view returns (uint256);
    function balanceOf(address account) external view returns (uint256);
}

Tip: Use Enumerable ERC-721 extensions if you need to iterate over all holders, but be mindful of gas costs.

Develop and Deploy the Smart Contract

Write and launch the NFT contract with integrated access control checks.

Detailed Instructions

Implement the contract using a framework like OpenZeppelin. Inherit from ERC721 and ERC721Enumerable. Integrate an access control modifier like onlyTokenHolder or onlyTierHolder(uint256 minTier) that checks the caller's NFT balance and traits. For soulbound tokens, override the _beforeTokenTransfer function to restrict transfers.

Sub-step 1: Write the minting function, ensuring proper access control (e.g., only an admin role can mint).
Sub-step 2: Implement view functions for dApps to query a user's access status, such as hasAccess(address user) returns (bool).
Sub-step 3: Deploy the contract to your target network (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet, Polygon). Record the deployed contract address (e.g., 0x...).

solidity
// Example modifier for token holder check
modifier onlyTokenHolder() {
    require(balanceOf(msg.sender) > 0, "Caller does not hold access NFT");
    _;
}

Tip: Thoroughly test the contract on a testnet (like Sepolia) using a framework like Hardhat or Foundry before mainnet deployment.

Integrate Verification into the dApp Frontend

Connect the frontend application to the blockchain to validate user NFTs.

Detailed Instructions

Use a library like ethers.js or viem to interact with the deployed contract. The frontend must check the connected wallet's address against the NFT contract. Perform an on-chain read call to balanceOf or a custom function like getTier. Handle the asynchronous nature of blockchain queries and potential RPC provider issues.

Sub-step 1: On user login (e.g., via MetaMask), obtain the userAddress from the provider.
Sub-step 2: Create a contract instance using the ABI and contract address: new ethers.Contract(address, abi, provider).
Sub-step 3: Call the verification function and conditionally render UI components or enable features based on the boolean or tiered result.

javascript
// Example frontend check using ethers.js
const contract = new ethers.Contract(nftAddress, nftABI, provider);
const userBalance = await contract.balanceOf(userAddress);
const hasAccess = userBalance.gt(0);

Tip: Cache verification results locally to reduce RPC calls, but implement a refresh mechanism for when the user's token balance might change.

Implement Server-Side or On-Chain Gated Actions

Protect backend endpoints or smart contract functions with NFT checks.

Detailed Instructions

For fully secure systems, the final access gate must be enforced on-chain or on a trusted backend. A smart contract function for a privileged action should use the onlyTokenHolder modifier. For off-chain APIs, your server must verify the user's NFT ownership by querying the blockchain itself or using a verifiable oracle.

Sub-step 1: For on-chain actions, ensure the target contract imports and calls your NFT contract's verification logic.
Sub-step 2: For server-side checks, use a node provider (Alchemy, Infura) to run the same balanceOf check performed by the frontend, but in a trusted environment.
Sub-step 3: Consider using signature verification (EIP-712) where users sign a message proving NFT ownership without exposing private keys.

solidity
// Example: A gated contract function
contract GatedVault {
    IAccessNFT public accessNFT;

    function deposit() external onlyNFTHolder {
        // Logic for token holders only
    }

    modifier onlyNFTHolder() {
        require(accessNFT.balanceOf(msg.sender) > 0, "Access denied");
        _;
    }
}

Tip: Server-side validation is crucial to prevent users from bypassing frontend checks and directly calling your API.

SECTION-FAQ

FAQ: Identity and Credit NFTs

Further Resources and Reading

ERC-721 Non-Fungible Token Standard

Specification and implementation details for NFTs used as persistent, transferable identity or reputation containers.

Visit resource

EIP-4973: Account-Bound (Soulbound) Tokens

EIP defining non-transferable NFTs used for onchain identity, credentials, and credit history primitives.

Visit resource

ERC-725: Ethereum Identity Standard

Standard for self-sovereign identity smart contracts enabling key management, claims, and attribute storage.

Visit resource

Ceramic Network Developer Documentation

Decentralized data network for DIDs and composable identity data used alongside NFTs and credit attestations.

Visit resource

Ethereum Improvement Proposals Repository

Canonical repository for EIPs related to NFTs, identity, soulbound tokens, and onchain credit mechanisms.

Visit resource

Ready to Start Building?

Let's bring your Web3 vision to life.

From concept to deployment, ChainScore helps you architect, build, and scale secure blockchain solutions.

Start Your Project View Our Work