Token Standards Used for Real World Assets

LABS

Token Standards Used for Real World Assets

Core RWA Token Standards

Technical specifications enabling the representation, transfer, and compliance of real-world assets on-chain.

ERC-3643

The ERC-3643 standard defines a permissioned token framework for compliant securities. It integrates on-chain identity verification and transfer rules directly into the token's logic. This standard is governed by the Tokenized Asset Association (TAA). It uses a system of on-chain compliance officers to approve or reject transactions based on investor status and jurisdictional rules. This matters because it provides a standardized, self-contained system for regulatory adherence without relying on external registries, crucial for institutional adoption.

ERC-1400 / ERC-1404

ERC-1400 is a comprehensive standard for security tokens, bundling issuance, compliance, and document management. ERC-1404 is a simpler, modular extension for adding transfer restrictions to existing ERC-20 tokens. These standards introduce partitioning to segregate token balances by investor class or jurisdiction and use controller contracts to enforce rules. This modularity allows issuers to implement complex capital table management and investor accreditation checks on-chain, providing flexibility for different regulatory environments.

ERC-3525

The ERC-3525 standard, or Semi-Fungible Token (SFT), represents assets with both fungible value and unique properties. Each token has an ID (for uniqueness) and a slot (for fungibility within a group). This structure is ideal for representing financial instruments like bonds or insurance policies, where each issuance has a unique identifier but shares core financial attributes with others in its series. It enables complex financial logic, such as coupon payments and maturity dates, to be encoded directly into the token's state.

ERC-1155

ERC-1155 is a multi-token standard that allows a single smart contract to manage an infinite number of fungible, non-fungible, and semi-fungible token types. Its key innovation is batch operations, enabling the transfer of multiple token classes in a single transaction, drastically reducing gas costs. This is critical for RWA platforms managing large inventories of distinct assets, like real estate deeds or luxury goods. It provides efficiency and flexibility for marketplaces and fractional ownership models where asset types are diverse.

ERC-4626

The ERC-4626 tokenized vault standard provides a unified interface for yield-bearing vaults that represent shares in a pool of underlying assets. It standardizes functions for depositing, withdrawing, and reading convertible assets. For RWAs, this enables the creation of compliant, interest-bearing tokens backed by real-world debt, revenue streams, or physical assets. It ensures interoperability between different vault implementations and DeFi protocols, allowing RWA yields to be seamlessly integrated into broader decentralized finance ecosystems.

Technical Specifications and Use Cases

Understanding RWA Token Standards

Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization involves creating a digital representation of a physical or financial asset on a blockchain. The choice of token standard dictates the asset's behavior, compliance features, and interoperability. The primary standards for RWAs are ERC-20 for fungible assets and ERC-721/ERC-1155 for non-fungible or unique assets, often extended with specialized modules.

Core Standards Explained

ERC-20: The standard for fungible tokens, ideal for representing divisible assets like debt, commodities, or fund shares. Each token is identical and interchangeable.
ERC-721: The standard for non-fungible tokens (NFTs), used for representing unique assets like real estate deeds, fine art, or specific loan agreements.
ERC-1155: A multi-token standard that can represent both fungible and non-fungible assets within a single contract, efficient for portfolios containing multiple asset types.

Basic Use Case

A platform like Centrifuge tokenizes an invoice as an ERC-20 token, allowing it to be pooled with others and used as collateral in DeFi protocols like MakerDAO to generate DAI stablecoin loans.

RWA Token Standards Comparison

Comparison of key technical and economic features across major tokenization standards.

Feature	ERC-1400 / ERC-1404	ERC-3643	ERC-3525
Primary Purpose	Security token issuance with complex compliance	Permissioned token framework for regulated assets	Semi-fungible tokens for structured financial assets
Transfer Restrictions	Built-in via `canTransfer` function	Core feature using on-chain identity registry	Flexible, defined by token logic
Compliance Model	Rule-based, embedded in contract logic	Identity-based, via on-chain whitelists	Programmable, logic-driven
Gas Cost for Transfer (Avg)	~120k - 180k gas	~150k - 220k gas	~90k - 130k gas
Interoperability	Standard ERC-20/ERC-721 compatibility layer	Designed for integration with enterprise systems	Compatible with ERC-721 and ERC-1155
Token Divisibility	Typically non-divisible (whole tokens)	Configurable, often non-divisible	Fully divisible (value & slot structure)
Primary Use Cases	Equity, debt, fund shares	Real estate, corporate bonds, loyalty points	Insurance policies, bonds, structured notes
Governance Complexity	High, requires detailed rule encoding	High, reliant on external registry management	Medium, logic resides in token contract

Implementing an RWA Token Standard

Process overview

Define Asset and Legal Framework

Establish the real-world asset's properties and compliance requirements.

Detailed Instructions

Begin by clearly defining the underlying asset (e.g., real estate, treasury bonds, commodities) and its legal structure. This involves creating a legal wrapper that defines ownership rights, transfer restrictions, and redemption mechanics. You must identify the jurisdiction, required KYC/AML procedures, and any accredited investor limitations. Draft the legal agreements that will govern the relationship between the token holder and the asset's legal owner or custodian.

Sub-step 1: Document the asset's valuation methodology and audit schedule.
Sub-step 2: Define the roles of issuer, sponsor, and custodian in the legal structure.
Sub-step 3: Establish the conditions for on-chain transfers versus off-chain legal transfers of title.

solidity
// Example struct for storing legal metadata on-chain
struct RWAMetadata {
    string jurisdiction;
    string ISIN; // International Securities Identification Number
    address legalCustodian;
    uint256 accreditationRequired; // Minimum token amount for accredited status
    bool transferRestricted;
}

Tip: Engage legal counsel early to ensure the on-chain logic accurately reflects off-chain obligations and regulatory compliance.

Select and Extend the Base Token Standard

Choose a foundational standard like ERC-20 or ERC-1400 and implement RWA-specific logic.

Detailed Instructions

Most RWA implementations start with ERC-20 for fungibility or ERC-721/ERC-1155 for non-fungible assets. For complex securities, ERC-1400 (Security Token Standard) provides built-in support for document management and forced transfers. The core task is to extend the chosen standard with permissioned transfer logic. This typically involves overriding the transfer and transferFrom functions to check against a whitelist or transfer agent contract before allowing the transaction to proceed.

Sub-step 1: Import the OpenZeppelin implementation of your chosen base standard.
Sub-step 2: Implement a _beforeTokenTransfer hook to enforce KYC/AML checks.
Sub-step 3: Integrate a whitelist manager contract (e.g., using OpenZeppelin's AccessControl).

solidity
// Simplified override for permissioned transfers
function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual override {
    super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, amount);
    require(whitelist.isWhitelisted(to), "RWA: Recipient not whitelisted");
    require(!isBlocked(from), "RWA: Sender is blocked");
    // Additional logic for region locking or investor caps
}

Tip: Use upgradeable proxy patterns (ERC-1967) to allow for future adjustments to compliance logic without migrating the asset.

Integrate Oracles and Asset Verification

Connect off-chain asset data and performance to the on-chain token.

Detailed Instructions

RWAs require a reliable bridge to real-world data. Implement oracles to feed critical information onto the blockchain, such as net asset value (NAV) updates, dividend distributions, or default events. Use a decentralized oracle network like Chainlink to pull in attested data from trusted APIs. For physical assets, you may need verifiable credentials or proof-of-reserve attestations hashed and stored on-chain. This step ensures the token's on-chain state reflects the underlying asset's true condition.

Sub-step 1: Define the data points needed (e.g., price, interest payment date, custody report hash).
Sub-step 2: Deploy or connect to oracle contracts (e.g., Chainlink AggregatorV3Interface).
Sub-step 3: Create a function for authorized issuers to post verified data or attestation hashes.

solidity
// Example function updating token NAV via an oracle
function updateNAV() external onlyRole(ORACLE_UPDATER_ROLE) {
    (
        uint80 roundId,
        int256 answer,
        uint256 startedAt,
        uint256 updatedAt,
        uint80 answeredInRound
    ) = navOracle.latestRoundData();
    require(answer > 0, "Invalid oracle answer");
    currentNAV = uint256(answer);
    lastNAVUpdate = block.timestamp;
    emit NAVUpdated(currentNAV, updatedAt);
}

Tip: Consider using TLSNotary proofs or similar technologies for verifiable off-chain data feeds to enhance trustlessness.

Implement Redemption and Settlement Mechanics

Define the process for token holders to claim the underlying asset or cash flow.

Detailed Instructions

The redemption mechanism is critical for linking token value to the RWA. Design a clear process where token holders can burn their tokens to receive either the physical asset, a cash equivalent, or periodic coupon payments. This often involves an off-chain settlement process initiated by an on-chain request. Implement a redemption queue or window system to manage liquidity and custodian operations. For debt instruments, automate interest distribution via a pull or push payment model directly to token holders.

Sub-step 1: Create a requestRedemption function that locks tokens and emits an event for the custodian.
Sub-step 2: Implement a distributeDividend function that allows the issuer to send payments pro-rata to holders.
Sub-step 3: Add a timelock or cooling-off period for redemptions to prevent bank runs.

solidity
// Core redemption request logic
function requestRedemption(uint256 amount) external {
    require(balanceOf(msg.sender) >= amount, "Insufficient balance");
    _burn(msg.sender, amount);
    redemptionQueue.push(RedemptionRequest(msg.sender, amount, block.timestamp));
    emit RedemptionRequested(msg.sender, amount, requestId);
    // Off-chain process begins; settlement occurs within agreed SLA
}

// Function for issuer to fulfill redemption
function fulfillRedemption(uint256 requestId, string memory txProof) external onlyCustodian {
    RedemptionRequest storage request = redemptionQueue[requestId];
    request.fulfilled = true;
    request.proof = txProof;
    emit RedemptionFulfilled(requestId, request.requester, request.amount);
}

Tip: Clearly document the service level agreement (SLA) for redemption processing times and any associated fees in the token's legal docs.

Deploy and Configure Permissioning Systems

Set up the administrative and regulatory controls for the live token.

Detailed Instructions

Before mainnet deployment, configure all access control roles. Use a system like OpenZeppelin's AccessControl to assign distinct roles: DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, WHITELIST_ADMIN, ORACLE_UPDATER, COMPLIANCE_MANAGER, and PAUSER. The compliance manager role should be able to freeze transfers for specific addresses in case of regulatory action. Deploy the token contract to the target network (often a permissioned chain or a layer-2 with privacy features) and initialize it with the correct parameters, including the initial whitelist and oracle addresses.

Sub-step 1: Deploy the token contract and all auxiliary contracts (whitelist, oracle adapters).
Sub-step 2: Grant roles to multi-signature wallets or decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) contracts for governance.
Sub-step 3: Perform a test mint and a full transfer/redemption cycle on a testnet with the legal counterparties.

solidity
// Example initialization in constructor or initializer function
constructor(
    string memory name_,
    string memory symbol_,
    address admin,
    address whitelistOracle
) ERC20(name_, symbol_) {
    _grantRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, admin);
    _grantRole(WHITELIST_ADMIN, admin);
    _setRoleAdmin(COMPLIANCE_MANAGER, DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE);
    oracle = AggregatorV3Interface(whitelistOracle);
    // Set initial supply to 0; tokens are minted upon asset deposit
}

Tip: Consider using a pause mechanism that can be activated by the compliance manager to halt all transfers in an emergency, a common requirement for regulated securities.

On-Chain Compliance and Verification

Tokenizing real-world assets requires embedding legal and regulatory frameworks directly into the token's logic. This section covers the standards and mechanisms that enforce compliance, verify holder eligibility, and manage asset lifecycle events on-chain.

ERC-3643

The ERC-3643 standard defines a framework for permissioned tokens with embedded compliance. It uses on-chain identity verification and rule engines.

Features compliance modules that validate transfers against KYC/AML status.
Implements on-chain claims for proof of accreditation or jurisdiction.
Enables granular transfer restrictions based on real-time wallet checks.
This matters as it provides a standardized, self-sovereign system for issuing regulated securities without relying solely on off-chain legal agreements.

ERC-1400 / ERC-1404

These security token standards provide modular frameworks for enforcing transfer restrictions and document management.

ERC-1400 uses partitioning to segregate token pools with different rules or asset backing.
ERC-1404 adds simple, gas-efficient transfer restrictions via a modifier pattern.
Includes mechanisms for attaching and verifying legal prospectuses (off-chain documents with on-chain hashes).
This is critical for representing complex equity or debt instruments where investor eligibility and corporate actions must be programmatically enforced.

Verifiable Credentials (VCs)

Verifiable Credentials are tamper-proof digital attestations, like KYC proofs, issued by trusted entities and stored in a user's wallet.

Enable selective disclosure where users prove specific claims without revealing full identity.
Use decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and cryptographic signatures for verification.
Can be checked on-chain via zero-knowledge proofs or oracle attestations.
This matters for user privacy and portability, allowing compliance status to travel with the wallet across different dApps and chains.

On-Chain Registries & Oracles

External compliance registries and oracle networks provide real-world data to smart contracts for verification.

Identity Registries maintain whitelists of verified wallet addresses and their KYC status.
Legal Oracle services attest to off-chain events like court rulings or regulatory changes.
Asset Registries provide proof of physical asset custody and insurance status.
This infrastructure is essential for bridging the gap between immutable blockchain logic and the dynamic nature of real-world law and asset custody.

Lifecycle Event Management

RWA tokens must programmatically handle corporate actions and asset servicing events.

Standards define functions for dividend distributions, interest payments, and voting.
Implement force transfer capabilities for mandatory events like bankruptcy or regulatory seizure.
Enable token freezing and thawing by authorized compliance officers.
This ensures the tokenized asset's economic and legal rights are fully executable on-chain, maintaining parity with its off-world counterpart.

Composability & Modular Enforcement

Modern RWA frameworks emphasize modular compliance, where rules are separate, upgradeable contracts.

Allows issuers to compose different rule sets (e.g., geography + investor type).
Enables post-issuance upgrades to compliance logic without migrating the core token.
Facilitates auditability as all rules and their interactions are transparent on-chain.
This modular approach future-proofs tokenized assets against evolving regulations and reduces technical debt for issuers.

SECTION-TECHNICAL_FAQ

Technical and Regulatory Considerations

Developer Resources and Specifications

Ethereum Token Standards Documentation

Official Ethereum documentation covering ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, and references to asset-backed and permissioned token standards.

Visit resource

EIP-1400: Security Token Standard

Formal Ethereum Improvement Proposal specifying interfaces and partitioned balances for security tokens and regulated assets.

Visit resource

ConsenSys ERC-1400 Reference Implementation

Reference smart contract implementation of ERC-1400 including compliance hooks and transfer restrictions.

Visit resource

OpenZeppelin Token Contracts

Audited Solidity implementations for ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, and extensions commonly used when issuing tokenized real world assets.

Visit resource

Tokeny T-REX (ERC-3643) Protocol

Open source protocol and smart contracts for compliant asset tokenization using identity and transfer restrictions.

Visit resource

Ready to Start Building?

Let's bring your Web3 vision to life.

From concept to deployment, ChainScore helps you architect, build, and scale secure blockchain solutions.

Start Your Project View Our Work